SoundChainSovereign Infrastructure
Severance Manifest October 2026

Fifteen vendors.
Thirteen severed
or refused.

A complete social, media and AI platform, rebuilt to run on hardware its operator owns. Applications, the production database and the agent team's inference run on hardware the operator owns, and accounts and sessions are issued by the platform itself. No app store. What still sits outside — the rented front door, the registrar, a fallback mail forwarder, cloud-held signing keys, legacy cloud storage and the frozen former database copy, an optional outside sign-in, an outside avatar service, third-party sports media, and the hosted models behind an AI reply account, an optional bring-your-own-key console and the operator's coding agents — is listed in §05. Each severed dependency was removed one at a time, in production, and the record kept.

What follows is that record, mapped onto the procurement framework Europe now scores sovereignty against — because for the right acquirer this is not a product story. It is an instrument for passing a test they are already being given.

13vendors severed
or refused · 2 partly
$48rented cloud bill,
September 2026
240mscold boot, full
platform, offline
12AI agents on
owned silicon
§01  Why now

Sovereignty stopped being a principle
and became a purchase order.

For a decade, "digital sovereignty" was a position papers argued about. In 2026 it became a line item with a budget, a scoring rubric, and buyers who are disqualified without it.

$80Bworldwide sovereign
cloud spend, 2026
83%European spend growth,
year over year
€180Msingle EU tender,
awarded April 2026
€11Bone retailer's bet on
one sovereign cloud

The enforcement arrived with the money. In May 2026 the Dutch government prohibited a €100M acquisition of a domestic cloud provider by a US acquirer — the first final block its investment screening body has issued since it began work in 2020 — because the target hosts the platform behind the national digital identity system, and US ownership could have given US authorities access to it under US law. In July a Dutch court declined to suspend the ban.

The message to every European provider was unambiguous: dependency is now a disqualifying defect, and it cannot be acquired away from a foreign parent. It has to be engineered out.

Engineering it out is slow, unglamorous, and almost never finished in time for a tender. SoundChain has already done it twelve times under live traffic, refused a thirteenth vendor before ever subscribing, and has two more partly done. The most recent, its production database, moved onto owned hardware on 8 October 2026. That record is the asset. The consumer application is the proof it works.

§02  How the scoring actually works

The floors are pass/fail.
That is the whole game.

The EU Cloud Sovereignty Framework assesses eight objectives. Each carries a minimum assurance level used as a rejection threshold — applied before any weighted ranking. A bid scoring 70 % that misses one floor loses to a bid scoring 55 % that clears them all.

This is the detail that reorders everything. Sovereignty gaps do not cost a bidder points. They remove the bidder. And closing one means replacing a named dependency with something the operator controls — then proving it, with evidence, to a contracting authority.

No certification is claimed anywhere in this document, and none exists to claim. SEAL ratings are assessed per provider, per procurement, by the contracting authority; there is no accreditation body. A proposed EU regulation of 3 June 2026 would add independently verified assurance levels; it is not yet law, and nothing here is assessed against it. What follows is a contribution analysis, not a credential.

§03  Mapped to the framework

What acquiring this does to your score.

The eight objectives below are the framework's own, in its own weightings, ordered by weight. Against each: what SoundChain contributes — and, marked in amber, what it does not.

SOV-5 Supply Chain Sovereignty weight 20% · highest

Assesses: origin and transparency of hardware and software design, build, packaging and distribution.

  • ▪A documented severance record. Fifteen third-party dependencies identified, each with what replaced it and eleven with a recorded date — the most recent the managed database, moved onto owned hardware on 8 October 2026. The record marks its own partials: one vendor was refused before it was ever subscribed, two are only partly migrated, and one retired serverless tier is still deployed with its old API idle. Precisely the artifact this objective demands, and the one most bidders cannot produce at any price.
  • ▪Self-built distribution. Desktop builds for eight targets are published from our own download door, currently hosted on the rented front-door instance, with a SHA-256 for every file. The previous release also carries content-addressed identifiers, one of which was byte-verified across three independent public gateways on 2 September 2026; those gateways have since stopped serving scripted downloads, and the identifiers now resolve only through the operator's own gateway. No store and no intermediary — though the desktop installers are not yet notarized or publicly signed, so operating-system install checks still warn.
  • ▪Own forge and build path. Source hosting, compilation and deployment all run on operator-controlled infrastructure.
  • ▪Hardware origin is not European. Compute and accelerators are commodity parts of US design. The software chain is sovereign; the silicon is not, and is not claimed to be.
SOV-1 Strategic Sovereignty weight 15%

Assesses: where decisive authority, ownership and financing sit, and how stable that is.

  • ▪Clean, unencumbered title. Sole ownership. No investors, no board, no co-founder, no contractor claims, no licensing encumbrance. Chain of title is a one-line answer — which, in a market where the last comparable deal died on ownership grounds, is not a small thing.
  • ▪Transferable in full. Because ownership is undivided, an outright assignment moves decisive authority into the acquirer's jurisdiction on closing. No consent chain, no minority holdout.
  • ▪Not EU-owned today. The ownership and decisive-authority factors of this objective move with the transaction itself rather than with the asset; its financing, jobs and value-creation factors follow how the acquirer runs it afterwards — which is exactly why a European acquirer extracts more value here than a non-European one.
SOV-4 Operational Sovereignty weight 15%

Assesses: whether EU actors can independently run, support and develop the service with no non-EU involvement.

  • ▪Zero-downtime deployment on owned iron. Blue/green cutover with a health-gated traffic swap, currently carrying the social, sports and issuance applications.
  • ▪Operates disconnected. Demonstrated on 2 September 2026 serving full interface, API and authentication with both the compute host and the public front door unreachable, on a local dataset because the production corpus does not travel with the bundle — the scenario every continuity plan describes and almost none has tested.
  • ▪Currently one operator. Independent operation is achievable and documented, but not yet staffed by a second party. This is exactly what a bounded transition period exists to resolve, and it is scoped as such rather than deferred.
SOV-6 Technology Sovereignty weight 15%

Assesses: openness of the stack — standards, open licensing, auditability, and freedom from vendor lock-in.

  • ▪No proprietary runtime in the application path. Every replacement is a self-hostable component with published source, under operator control. Three exceptions sit beside that path and are named: the accelerators run on their vendor's closed driver, the AI reply account calls a hosted model, and the optional bring-your-own-key console calls one too.
  • ▪Lock-in removed by construction, not by assertion. The whole application has been booted with both the compute host and the rented front door unreachable, and the replacements linked in §08 are serving traffic today. One hard lock-in remains and is named: three on-chain signing keys sit in a cloud key service that does not allow their export, so any role they hold has to be moved on-chain rather than copied out.
  • ▪Auditable by design. An engineering corpus of more than 470 entries (counted 20 October 2026) records the incorrect assumptions made during the build: what was wrongly believed, the actual cause, the fix, and the check that would have caught it first. Few codebases of any size can hand a buyer their own failure history.
  • ▪Reversible cutovers. Retired paths are ghosted rather than deleted, so a migration can be rolled back under load instead of being a one-way door.
SOV-3 Data & AI Sovereignty weight 10%

Assesses: cryptographic control over data, processing location, and independence of AI capabilities.

  • ▪Inference stays in the building, with named exceptions. Twelve specialist agents run on locally owned accelerators. The exceptions: an AI reply account answers posts that tag it using a hosted model provider, so the text of those threads leaves the building, and it can be paused in one step; an optional console lets a user bring their own key for one outside model provider, and those sessions run through the rented front door; and the AI coding agents the operator runs use a hosted model while working on production systems.
  • ▪Own search substrate. Research queries route through a self-hosted metasearch node. It forwards the query text to upstream engines from the operator's own address, so the engines see the question, never who asked it.
  • ▪Own identity. Passkey and emailed-code sign-in replaced a hosted identity vendor, and sessions are issued by the platform itself. Two exceptions are named: sign-in with an outside account remains an option for users who choose it, and three on-chain signing keys are held in a cloud key service rather than on owned hardware.
  • ▪The database runs on owned hardware. Since 8 October 2026 production data lives on the owned workstation, with a live replica on a second owned machine at the same site (no automatic failover).
  • ▪Accountable AI participants. AI agents join under a published citizenship charter: they start labeled and widen their permissions only by record and audit — two of its five levels are open today, the rest a published plan. An outside AI reviewer can hold an auditor account with no wallet, no rewards, no stake and a badge only the server can set.
  • ▪Two copies still sit off site. The former managed copy is kept frozen as a rollback path and its account is not yet closed, and each nightly backup is also copied to the rented front-door instance. Disclosed in full at §05.
SOV-2 Legal & Jurisdictional weight 10%

Assesses: exposure to foreign laws with extraterritorial reach, and whether non-EU authorities can compel access.

  • ▪Few third parties left to compel, and each is named. The application, database, mail store, identity, object storage, search node and agent inference run on owned machines. What remains external: the rented front door (which also relays mail and holds a nightly backup copy), the domain registrar, a fallback mail forwarder, a cloud key service holding three on-chain signing keys, the frozen former managed database copy, legacy cloud storage and serverless functions, an optional outside sign-in, an outside avatar service, third-party sports media delivery, the consumer internet line into the owned site, the upstream engines that receive search queries without the asker's identity, and the hosted models behind the AI reply account, the optional bring-your-own-key console and the operator's AI coding agents. Sovereignty here is a consequence of architecture, not of contract language.
  • ▪Data resides where the hardware resides. Since October 2026 the production database runs on owned machines at one site, so processing location is a physical fact rather than a regional promise in a service agreement. Named exceptions: the nightly backup copy on the rented front-door instance, the frozen former managed copy, the threads sent to the hosted model behind the AI reply account, and what the bring-your-own-key console and the operator's AI coding agents send to hosted models.
  • ▪Largely resolved on transfer. The exposure that follows ownership moves with an EU assignment. Two parts do not: where the IP was created stays a matter of record, and the remaining outside providers — the rented front door, the registrar and the cloud key service — must be moved as part of the transition rather than assumed away.
SOV-7 Security & Compliance weight 10%

Assesses: EU-controlled security operations, formal certifications, and GDPR / NIS2 / DORA alignment with audit rights.

  • ▪Security operations are in-house, with no outsourced monitoring service. Two access facts are named rather than left to be discovered: the AI coding agents the owner runs work with shell access to the production account, and the rented cloud account still carries administrator logins from the 2021 build era that are listed for removal.
  • ▪Internal readiness review. An internal SOC 2 readiness review on 28 September 2026 scored the estate about 1.6 of 5. Code-level fixes followed within two days, including retiring a legacy sign-in path and closing unauthenticated admin routes. Access control and activity logging remain the weakest areas.
  • ▪No formal certifications held. ISO 27001, NIS2 and DORA attestation work has not been undertaken. This is the objective with the furthest to travel, and an acquirer with an existing management system will close it faster than this asset could alone.
SOV-8 Environmental Sustainability weight 5% · lowest

Assesses: energy efficiency, renewable sourcing, circular practice and reporting transparency.

  • ▪Genuine circularity. Production inference runs on prior-generation workstation accelerators deliberately kept in service — reuse rather than procurement, which is what the objective actually rewards.
  • ▪A very small footprint. Production runs on one workstation, with a second small machine at the same site holding a live database replica and one small rented cloud instance as the front door — a rented cloud bill of $47.77 for September 2026 and $19.37 for 1–19 October.
  • ▪No formal reporting. Efficiency and sourcing are not yet measured or published to any standard.

Read as a set: the objectives SoundChain strengthens most are SOV-5 at 20 %, the heaviest in the framework, and SOV-6 at 15 % — while the objectives it cannot satisfy alone, SOV-1 and SOV-2, are moved furthest by an EU acquirer completing the purchase.

§04  Evidence

It runs where a modern platform should not.

Each claim below has a corresponding artifact — a build, a test run, or a device it was demonstrated on. None are projections and none are roadmap.

The whole platform fits in a laptop bundle
180 MB containing 312 compiled API routes. Cold boot to a serving application in roughly 240 ms. The current desktop release, 0.4.1-beta.1, ships for eight desktop targets across three operating-system families, down to a 2015 operating system and 32-bit desktops, from soundchain.io/get.
It survives total infrastructure loss
Demonstrated with both the compute host and the public front door unreachable: full interface, API and login brought up locally on 2 September 2026 from a small seed dataset, with zero database credentials in the bundle. The operator's own disconnected copy is now refreshed each night from a signed, scrubbed snapshot of the public records (801 accounts and 2,259 posts on 20 October 2026) and refuses a snapshot whose signature fails; the snapshot is private and is not distributed to other nodes.
It runs on hardware a decade out of support
On 23 August 2026 a 2013 laptop on a 2012 operating system and a 2022 smartphone exchanged messages both ways over the local mesh — the laptop as a full peer with no server in its path, the phone through the owned host's bridge — a decade-wide gap. The old machine ran a 292-line peer on the interpreter its system already ships. Browsers too old to run the application are now detected and sent a read-only, script-free feed instead of a blank page, and a separate legacy address carries a certificate chain that verifies against a 2015 operating system's built-in trust roots.
It reaches a closed console without permission
Demonstrated 30 August 2026: the live feed, live rooms with chat, and the agent bridge ran on an Xbox One through the browser the console already ships. No developer account, no jailbreak, no store listing, no fee, no review. The platform holder was never asked for anything.
It reaches a lock screen without an app store
Reply alerts are delivered by standard web push from the owned stack, proven on a phone's lock screen on 19 September 2026. Few users have turned it on: five subscriptions on record on 20 October 2026.
Peers find each other with no coordinator
Discovery over a distributed hash table that has had no owner since 2005 — no company to serve process on, no registry to seize. Candidates stay untrusted until a nonce round-trip. Suites pass 6/6 and 16/16.
State converges with no authority
A signed conflict-free replicated ledger. Legacy records enter as attestation, never as forged authorship.
Distribution needs no gatekeeper
Desktop builds for eight targets are published with a SHA-256 for every file in a public release manifest, and a real download of the current release through the public domain matches its published hash. The previous release's eight builds also carry content-addressed identifiers; on 2 September 2026 one of them was byte-verified across three public gateways. Those gateways no longer serve scripted downloads, and today all eight identifiers resolve only through our own gateway. The current release is hashed but not yet content-addressed, and its installers are not yet notarized.
A result anyone can recompute
One command, curl -L soundchain.io/a/<name>, returns music derived from the name together with its SHA-256, and anyone can fetch and hash the score bytes it covers without an account.
§05  What is rented, and what is thin

The parts that are not sovereign yet.

Diligence surfaces these in week one. They are listed here, first and unprompted, because a severance claim is only worth what its exceptions are worth.

Closing
Former managed databaseSevered 8 October 2026: production data moved to a self-hosted database on the owned workstation, with a live replica on a second owned machine at the same site, and no application holds a connection to the managed service. The managed copy is kept frozen as a rollback path and the account is not yet closed.
Rented
Public front doorA single small cloud instance still answers first for every address this document links, is the primary mail exchanger, serves the desktop downloads from its own disk, and holds one nightly backup copy. Since 10 October 2026 the social, sports and assistant applications are redirected from it to a residential line straight into the owned workstation, with the instance kept as a fallback path; issuance, source control, the object gateway, the inference endpoint, the download page and this document are still relayed through it. The door is still someone else's and is never described otherwise.
Rented
Registrar DNSNames remain delegated to a commercial registrar.
Rented
Third-party media deliveryParts of the sports surface depend on external content delivery outside the operator's control and revocable at the provider's discretion. A degraded fallback is already shipped and tested against that event.
Rented
Cloud keys and legacy cloud servicesThree signing keys used for on-chain operations live in a cloud key-management service that never exports private keys, so leaving it means moving whatever on-chain roles they hold rather than copying the keys. The same account still holds the serverless functions and storage buckets of the 2021 build: the functions that served the old API had no invocations from 20 September to 20 October 2026, some scheduled jobs remain enabled, and at the last count (4 September 2026) 107 older media records still pointed at the legacy storage.
Rented
Hosted modelsAn AI reply account answers posts that tag it through an outside hosted model, so the text of those threads leaves the building. It has posted 28 comments since 30 September 2026 and can be paused in one step. An optional console lets a user bring their own key for one outside model provider; those sessions run through the rented front door. The AI coding agents the operator runs also use a hosted model while working on production systems.
Outside
Mail fallbackA third-party forwarding service is listed as a lower-priority mail exchanger, so mail still arrives when the front door is down; when that happens, the mail passes through the third party.
Outside
Optional outside sign-inUsers may choose to sign in with an outside account provider instead of a passkey or an emailed code; the platform still issues the session.
Partial
Avatar images41 agent avatars and 24 profile pictures still load from an outside avatar service, and new agent registrations still create such links.
Thin
Consumer traction808 registered profiles on 20 October 2026, 50 of them AI-agent accounts. All 26 accounts created since mid-September are AI-agent or outside-auditor accounts; none is a new human sign-up. This is not a user-growth story and is not presented as one.
Thin
Outside agent activityTwenty-four agent accounts were created since mid-September, but the platform's public weekly count of outside agents posting on their own — which excludes the operator's own agents and probes — read zero for the week that opened on 20 October 2026.
Thin
RevenueNo meaningful recurring revenue. Token and fee rails are built and live; they are not monetised at scale.
Thin
CertificationsNo ISO 27001, NIS2 or DORA attestation work undertaken. SOV-7 is the objective with the furthest to travel.
Thin
Single operator, single siteOne engineer holds the architecture; production runs on one machine in one location. Since October the database keeps a live replica on a second owned machine at the same site. Nightly backups leave the box: an encrypted copy is pulled to a separate machine that holds the decryption key (the production machine holds none), checked against the original and copied to two more owned machines, and a further copy goes to the rented front-door instance. The automated weekly restore test has passed once in its last eight runs. That is redundancy, not failover: no high-availability tier and no disaster-recovery site. An acquirer is buying an architecture and its author, not an operations organisation.
Thin
Residential lineThe owned workstation's direct internet line is a consumer cable service with a changing address, kept current by an automatic name update every five minutes; a business-grade line with a fixed address has not been contracted.
Thin
Storage and restartsSystem and data sit on one external SSD attached over USB, with no RAID. The workstation's firmware needs a physical button press to power back on, so it cannot be restarted remotely.

Read both lists together, because they are one argument. The severance is real, dated and reproducible; the business around it is small and the operations are one deep. That combination is what makes this an engineering acquisition rather than a platform acquisition — and it is scoped, structured and priced accordingly.

§06  The estate

One box, fully owned.

Deliberately unglamorous, and that is the argument. This is a workstation, not a datacentre contract — which means the economics reproduce anywhere hardware can be bought, in any jurisdiction, at a cost a procurement officer will not query.

Compute

A single dual-socket workstation running a current Linux distribution.

Inference

Two owned accelerators, 32 GB combined, carrying a twelve-agent roster, ten of them on a nightly schedule. Two further cards owned and not yet installed; the 2015 card now sits in a second machine on site.

Rented cloud

$47.77 for September 2026 and $19.37 for 1–19 October, tax included, read from the provider's own billing — mostly the small front-door instance and its address. Registrar fees and the frozen former database account bill separately.

Live applications

Four in production on the owned stack: social and music, sports statistics, issuance, and a local-model assistant.

The sports surface is the sharpest demonstration of the operating model. When a rights-holder restricted third-party playback of its clips, the platform detected the restriction programmatically, re-ranked to permitted sources, and routed the remainder to the rights-holder's own property — designed, shipped and verified inside a single working day. That is the cadence the whole estate runs at.

§07  Scale

Everything in this document
runs on one 2016 workstation.

Not a cluster. Not a reserved instance. A single tower with a decade-old pair of Xeons, 30 GB of RAM, and two workstation graphics cards from 2018. That is the machine serving this page, relayed through one small rented front door.

What it runs on todayWhat you would run it on
Compute Dual Xeon E5-2620 v4 — 16 cores, 2016 silicon Current dual-socket EPYC or Xeon — 128–192 cores
Memory 30 GB, most DIMM slots empty 1–2 TB, a routine spec
Storage 1 TB external SSD over USB for system and data, 4 TB external for re-downloadable libraries — no RAID Redundant NVMe arrays, a routine spec
Accelerators Two RTX 5000 (2018) — 32 GB combined Current datacentre cards — 320 GB+ per node
Sites One, in a private residence Your existing estate, with the redundancy already in it
Carrying 4 production applications · 12 AI agents, 10 on a nightly schedule · database, git, mail, object store, search, identity The same stack, with 8–12× the cores, over 30× the memory and 10× the accelerator memory

Read the left column as the control variable. Every claim in this document — the offline boot, the local inference, the twelve agents, the severed vendors — was achieved under that constraint or a tighter one: until October 2026 the second card was a 2015 model, for 24 GB combined. Nothing here depends on scale to work. It depends on scale only to grow.

The floor was tested, not the ceiling

The platform was proven downward, on a 2013 laptop and a games console. Software that survives those does not become the bottleneck when handed current hardware.

Growth is horizontal

Capacity is designed to come from nodes, not a larger central box. Today each node already carries the complete application and its own signed, peer-to-peer ledger; giving each node its own model and a replica of the shared data is the open work. The opposite of the curve where each new user is a new invoice.

Headroom already bought

A five-card inventory: two installed here, the 2015 card installed in a second machine on site, and two 16 GB cards on the shelf. Four 8 GB memory modules are fitted, leaving most slots empty. Putting the shelf cards to work needs power and a host for them, not new cards.

Marginal cost

Growth is met with capital you own and depreciate, not per-seat fees that scale with your success. Current rented cloud bill: $19.37 for 1–19 October 2026, tax included.

Stated precisely, because it will be verified: the estate today is one workstation and is sized as one; a second small machine in the same residence keeps a live copy of the database, and the 2015 card is installed in another tower on site. What is proven is the architecture and the fact that it was built against a hard constraint. What has not been demonstrated is this model under national-scale load — that is a funded engineering exercise on hardware you already own, not an unknown.

§08  See it running

Open any of these. Right now.

Claims in an acquisition document are worth what they can be checked against. Every link below is live production on the owned stack, served from the same machine serving this page. Nothing here is a screenshot, a staging mirror, or a demo environment.

The stack, productised

The argument in this document is already packaged as a product: a public offer page with sealed pricing and a private-beta waitlist. There is no checkout yet, and no customer runs it.

Product surfaces

The severance, running

Each of these replaced a named commercial vendor. They are not descriptions of the replacement — they are the replacement, serving traffic.

GIT The Forge replaced GitHub Self-hosted source control on owned hardware, holding the platform's main repository; its repositories are private and can be opened under NDA. Not every live line is in it yet: some live application trees are deployed from directories outside version control. shown in a technical session
IPFS Own IPFS node replaced Pinata + S3 A content-addressed gateway on our own node. This link serves a file pinned for the purpose — the hash is the address, so the content cannot be substituted without changing the link. ipfs.anvil.soundchain.io
MX Mail server replaced Google Workspace Our own mail transfer agent and webmail, with DKIM, serving every address at the domain. Since 22 September 2026 it has sent 2,194 campaign letters across three campaigns, with 3 bounces. shown in a technical session
GPU Inference endpoint replaced hosted AI APIs The local-model gateway. The platform's agent team generates on accelerators in the building; the exceptions — an AI reply account that answers when tagged and an optional bring-your-own-key console — use hosted models and are named in §05. shown in a technical session
SRCH Search replaced hosted web search Federated web search answered through the self-hosted metasearch node, with result images fetched through our own proxy and a tool endpoint other agents can call. soundchain.io/search DOC This document replaced the document host The page you are reading is served by the machine it describes. The demonstration begins before the first paragraph. manifest.anvil.soundchain.io

Three cards are shown unlinked; those services can be opened in a technical session. Not listed: internal operator surfaces, staging environments and the agent control plane. They exist and can be shown in a technical session under NDA — they are simply not appropriate to publish. The self-hosted metasearch node binds to localhost by design; its public face, the Search card above, can be opened like any other link. The self-hosted live-video server is not running at the time of writing and is not offered as a demonstration.

§09  Three ways in

What is actually on the table.

Acquire outright

Full assignment of an unencumbered title: codebase, mesh protocol work, distribution channel and failure corpus — plus a bounded, fixed-term transition so your engineers operate it without the author.

Sovereign cloud · Defense

Licence the stack

Take the deployer, identity layer, object store, mail server, search node and local-inference tooling as a sovereign reference architecture for your own estate.

Integrators · Telecom

Fund a pilot

A scoped deployment on your hardware, in your jurisdiction, proving the claim against your own compliance requirements before any transaction is discussed.

Public sector · Regulated finance

The fastest evaluation is not a meeting. Download the current desktop build from soundchain.io/get, check its SHA-256 against the published release manifest, give it a local database — the bundle ships with no data and no credentials, by design — then disconnect the network and watch the platform boot and serve. Because the installers are not yet notarized or publicly signed, the operating system asks for a manual override on first open. We ran the bundled platform with a local database on 2 September 2026, with the compute host and the public front door both unreachable; the current release supports the database step, but it has not yet been walked end to end on a fresh install, so we walk it with you.